

Discover more from Slack Tide by Matt Labash

Editor’s Note: Have a burning sensation? Consult your urologist. Have a burning question? Ask Matt Labash at askmattlabash@gmail.com. All questions cannot be answered, but they will all be prayerfully considered, given a hot meal and a warm bed, and banked for future consideration.
Dear Matt,
What are we going to do with all these COVID anti-vaxxers? Should you take out the ones on the left and I’ll take out the ones on the right?
Dr. Anthony F.
What are we? Butch and Sundance shooting our way out of our hidey hole? We’ll never make it out alive. Like those doomed outlaws, we’re surrounded. We’ll likely die in a hail of gunfire. Or more likely, in a barrage of really acerbic tweets.
I proudly admit that I took the Trump Vaccine, and have encouraged everyone in my orbit to do the same. (Sometimes, to no avail.) Not only did it seem to me like the smartest health call, but it’s the least I could do to support our former president after he was generous enough to invent the vaccines in between rounds of golf and séances with his “super genius” uncle, the former MIT professor. (Though Trump doesn’t like to brag – it’s not his way). And while I hate to disappoint the scaremongers, neither did I, nor the legions of vaccinated people I know, suffer side effects. Unless you count smugness and unwarranted feelings of invincibility. (Half of us got infected with what we presume was Omicron anyway in the space of a month, though nobody I know ended up in the hospital.)
But I propose something truly radical to my vaccinated friends instead: how about we accept the unvaxxed? Since it’s really not our prerogative not to. Not in America, land that I love, which, if I want to keep it that way, increasingly means swallowing my desire to thump perceived knuckleheads who don’t believe the same way I do, even if peer-reviewed studies have proven me to be right 97.9 percent of the time. (Google it, doubters.) One of the blessings/hazards of living in a free country is that people are theoretically, you know……free. That means they’re largely free to do what they like, which will often conflict with what I like, or think is the best course of action. And vice versa. (They think you and I are knuckleheads, too, for rushing something into our bodies that just arrived about five minutes ago.)
Make no mistake, I have a ton of problems with the current anti-vaxxer impulse. I’ve found too many of its proponents to be gratuitously quarrelsome, ill-informed, paranoid, and bad at medical math. And here are some not-so-fun medical math facts: Since COVID washed up on our shores two years ago, 886,000 Americans have died from it. At the current clip, over a million will have died by early spring. To people who say this is “just the flu,” they should know that the very worst flu year on recent record - around 61,000 deaths in a year - is still 7.2 times less deadly than our average COVID year so far. In fact, there were 3,567 new COVID deaths just yesterday. Likewise, the unvaccinated are filling our ICU’s and/or dying at much higher rates. In Fayette County, Kentucky, 92 percent of COVID patients in the ICU are unvaccinated, as are 100 percent of those on ventilators. Those types of numbers are shaking out all over the place. In Washington state, if you’re unvaccinated and between 35-64 years old, you’re eight times more likely to be hospitalized than the fully-vaccinated are, and 13 times more likely to die of COVID than fully-vaccinated 65+ year olds. According to the CDC’s December numbers, the unvaccinated stood a 17-times-higher chance of being hospitalized than did the vaccinated who were ages 50 and older.
But even that avalanche of evidence doesn’t convince me that anti-vaxxers should have their livelihoods destroyed because they see things another way, some of the time, in good faith. (This being a novel coronavirus, it means it’s new – we often don’t even know what we don’t know, and are learning as we go along.) Nor does it mean they don’t have some legitimate objections about apparent vaccination inconsistencies, if we are as open-minded as we congratulate ourselves for being.
What Omicron has proven to anyone with basic powers of observation and even a room-temperature IQ, is that the vaxxed and unvaxxed can both spread it liberally. If the vaccines actually prevented people from spreading it, then I might sign up for mandates tomorrow. But what I can’t square is how, just because the unvaxxed get sicker and die at much higher rates, why that warrants upending their lives by say, prohibiting them from flying or working. Yes, they put more pressure on our hospitals. And I genuinely feel sorry for our doctors and nurses who have to put up with so much politicized COVID-denial rage. (Remember when we used to applaud our healthcare front-liners, rather than ignore or demonize them, the latter of which is truly disgraceful?) But people who smoke a pack a day and eat boxes of Ring Dings for dinner also tax our health-care system. We don’t tell them they can’t eat at restaurants.
Purported science-lovers love to “follow the science” when it’s breaking their way, politically, but as soon as it doesn’t – see denying biological gender realities, denying fetal viability, etc. – all of a sudden, their science adherence tends to grow a little lax. If you’re a true seeker of truth, you let inconvenient facts work their voodoo on your opinions, too. Which requires admitting that sometimes your absolutist beliefs are just that – beliefs – not, necessarily, incontrovertible facts.
Even H.L. Mencken, who was sure of himself an awful lot, once admitted:
Moral certainty is always a sign of cultural inferiority. The more uncivilized the man, the surer he is that he knows precisely what is right and what is wrong. All human progress, even in morals, has been the work of men who have doubted the current moral values, not of men who have whooped them up and tried to enforce them. The truly civilized man is always skeptical and tolerant, in this field as in all others. His culture is based on "I am not too sure.”
As much as I respect our medical professionals – many of whom deserve medals for what they’ve endured the past two years - I do have to laugh, sometimes, when people blithely say, “Talk to your doctor about the best course of action.” When I contracted a mild case of COVID in December, I did talk to a doctor, asking him if I still needed to get the booster, which I had been about to do when I got sick. He smiled – at least I think he smiled, he was masked – and said, “You just got the booster. Nature’s booster.” When I solicited a second opinion from my regular doctor – who works at the same practice right down the hall – he told me, “You most likely have an increased immune response at this point in time. Having had two shots and now the virus itself, you should have fairly high antibody levels towards the virus. It is still recommended that you get the booster…….I would think some time in the next six to eight weeks would be reasonable. Watch the news for updates as this may change over the next eight weeks.”
Doctors, it turns out, are largely like us – stumbling around in the dark, reading the internet to work out the latest clues and particulars, trying to put the jigsaw puzzle together just like me and you. As Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid screenwriter William Goldman once said of the entertainment industry, “Nobody knows anything.”
So let’s admit, even to the unvaxxed if we have to, that there are some things we think we know, and there is much we still don’t. That the vaccines are one of three tools in our toolkit (the others being masking and distancing), but that none of these are eradicating the problem, even if they can mitigate it more than the let-‘er-rippers like to admit. In the meantime, maybe what we should all be doing is proceeding with caution and compassion and humility through what has proven to be an unending ordeal. This is good medicine, even if next-to-nobody wants to take it. And here’s hoping that some day soon, Mother Nature takes her knee off our necks, and is more merciful to us than we’ve been to each other.
Bonus track: An apt anthem for the moment - my very favorite Marvin Gaye song, “Piece of Clay.”
The Divided States
Just don't get why acquired immunity doesn't get a play. Damn, the Native Americans almost got wiped out by the coronavirus (common cold) from the first Europeans setting foot here. Surely the young and healthy acquired an immunity and unfortunately the risk groups took a hit. So vax is beneficial to those risk groups. Healthy with acquired immunity from exposure are in good shape and if they want the vax go for it. Acquired immunity should be on equal footing, don't accuse us all of being anti-vax. In this case most of us, especially in NYC, were exposed during the onset. Especially the "essential workers" - now fire them? Please those castigating these workers are either ill-informed or naive, take your pick. Our immune system is pretty damn good!
Matt, Very, very well done. Live and let live (or maybe "Live and Let Die" unless that's a copyright violation). Sorry, maybe that's harsh.
A point you touched on briefly with your mention of the differing advice you got from two doctors is the constantly changing "wisdom" from the CDC and Fauci. While some of this is understandable (we're all trying to figure this out), some of it does feel like there is some ulterior motive that I and others don't understand and makes people suspicious. There have been dozens of studies/papers supporting natural immunity as being as good or better than the vaccine. No rational person would suggest you should deliberately get Covid but why have the CDC and Fauci ignored natural immunity in their recommendations on vaccination? The CDC finally just published a study showing natural immunity was more effective than the vaccine at preventing an infection from Delta. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2022/01/19/cdc-prior-covid-infection-offered-more-protection-against-delta-than-vaccines---but-both-together-did-best/?sh=2ac249193d04 This is logical since the vaccine was based on Alpha. The strength of natural immunity has been known for over a year by virtue of studies in other countries but ignored here. Why? People have been fired from jobs who already had Covid because of the CDC and Fauci's refusal to acknowledge natural immunity. This is the kind of thing that throws gas on the vaccine hesitancy fire.
There also have been studies for over a year showing that N95 masks are the only masks that are highly effective at stopping the spread of Covid. Why was that ignored for so long and NOW is finally admitted? If the CDC and Fauci had communicated in a forthright and honest way from the beginning, I think the vaccine resistors would have been much more likely to come around. Fauci’s credibility dropped dramatically in my mind when, after saying people shouldn’t go to church, shouldn’t go to indoor or outdoor sporting events and naming many other specific activities people shouldn’t do, he refused to say that people jamming into the streets at a demonstration was a bad idea. It was obvious at that point that he was politicized.
Fauci’s attempts to marginalize the epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard as “fringe epidemiologists” because they dared to suggest that lock downs caused more harm than good is outrageous. See the Great Barrington Declaration which is now, over a year later, gaining more acceptance. His work to convince his associates to stamp out any suggestion of a Wuhan Lab Leak in the letter they published in the Lancet in early 2020 has now been exposed. How could it possibly have been known in early 2020 that it was impossible for Covid to have come from a lab? And NOW we are finally looking into this as a possibility. His lies about NIH funding of gain of function research that has now been exposed, changing the definition of gain of function research to try to cover this up as well as changing the definition of vaccine itself so the Covid shot could be called a vaccine all add to the ability of the vaccine hesitant to feel justified in their position.
I’m vaccinated and boosted. I believe in them but something is wrong with the CDC, Fauci and even the FDA in their processes and communication and, I believe, motives. Either they are supremely incompetent or they are crooked or maybe both. Rather than have open conversations with experienced, informed persons that may have different opinions, Fauci has attacked or bullied others in his field to make sure his is the only opinion that appears credible. And he's had lots of help from the media who have taken the position that any views not in alignment with Fauci and the CDC are misinformation no matter how expert the opposing opinion may be. (See Dr. Robert Malone being recently banned from Twitter. I have no idea whether he is right or wrong but he is certainly qualified to speak on the subject of vaccines and MRNA.) It is extraordinarily dangerous for the scientific community not to have open debate and dialogue on these important matters. People are not stupid. They see this happening and it adds to their suspicions about the information they are receiving. As a result, anti-vaxers have ample ammunition for believing they are right which is sad since they may pay with their life for their views.